Dog Control (Perro de Presa Canario) Order 2008

  • expired
  • Dog Control (Perro de Presa Canario) Order 2008: expired (without coming into force), on 21 April 2009, pursuant to section 78B(4)(b) of the Dog Control Act 1996 (1996 No 13).

Reprint
as at 21 April 2009

Crest

Dog Control (Perro de Presa Canario) Order 2008

(SR 2008/111)

Anand Satyanand, Governor-General

Order in Council

At Wellington this 21st day of April 2008

Present:
His Excellency the Governor-General in Council

  • Dog Control (Perro de Presa Canario) Order 2008: expired (without coming into force), on 21 April 2009, pursuant to section 78B(4)(b) of the Dog Control Act 1996 (1996 No 13).

Note

Changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in this reprint.

A general outline of these changes is set out in the notes at the end of this reprint, together with other explanatory material about this reprint.

This order is administered by the Department of Internal Affairs.

Pursuant to section 78A of the Dog Control Act 1996, His Excellency the Governor-General makes the following order acting—

  • (a) on the advice and with the consent of the Executive Council; and

  • (b) on the recommendation of the Minister of Local Government (having satisfied the requirements of section 78C of that Act).

Order

1 Title

  • This order is the Dog Control (Perro de Presa Canario) Order 2008.

2 Commencement

  • This order comes into force on a date to be appointed by an Order in Council made under section 78B of the Dog Control Act 1996.

3 Schedule 4 of Dog Control Act 1996 amended

  • Part 1 of Schedule 4 of the Dog Control Act 1996 is amended by adding the following item: “Perro de Presa Canario”.

Diane Morcom,
Clerk of the Executive Council.

Explanatory note

This note is not part of the order, but is intended to indicate its general effect.

This order amends the Dog Control Act 1996 (the Act) by adding the Perro de Presa Canario breed (commonly known as the Presa Canario) to Schedule 4 of the Act. Schedule 4 lists the breeds or types of dogs that may not be imported into New Zealand but, if already in the country, must be muzzled when at large or in any public place or in any private way.

The Perro de Presa Canario has been used for organised dog fights. Its popularity increased after one of the breed was involved in a fatal attack on a human in California. At the time that these regulations were developed, the Department of Internal Affairs, the government body that administers the Act, was not aware of any of these dogs being present in New Zealand.

This order comes into force on a date to be set by Order in Council (the commencement order). Under section 78B of the Act, a commencement order may be made only after this order has been approved by resolution of the House of Representatives. Approval can be given no earlier than 28 days after the date on which this order is notified in the Gazette.

Issued under the authority of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989.

Date of notification in Gazette: 24 April 2008.

Contents

  • 1General

  • 2Status of reprints

  • 3How reprints are prepared

  • 4Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989

  • 5List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)

Notes
1 General

  • This is a reprint of the Dog Control (Perro de Presa Canario) Order 2008. The reprint incorporates all the amendments to the order as at 21 April 2009, as specified in the list of amendments at the end of these notes.

    Relevant provisions of any amending enactments that contain transitional, savings, or application provisions that cannot be compiled in the reprint are also included, after the principal enactment, in chronological order. For more information, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/reprints/ .

2 Status of reprints

  • Under section 16D of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, reprints are presumed to correctly state, as at the date of the reprint, the law enacted by the principal enactment and by the amendments to that enactment. This presumption applies even though editorial changes authorised by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 have been made in the reprint.

    This presumption may be rebutted by producing the official volumes of statutes or statutory regulations in which the principal enactment and its amendments are contained.

3 How reprints are prepared

  • A number of editorial conventions are followed in the preparation of reprints. For example, the enacting words are not included in Acts, and provisions that are repealed or revoked are omitted. For a detailed list of the editorial conventions, see http://www.pco.parliament.govt.nz/editorial-conventions/ or Part 8 of the Tables of New Zealand Acts and Ordinances and Statutory Regulations and Deemed Regulations in Force.

4 Changes made under section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989

  • Section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 authorises the making of editorial changes in a reprint as set out in sections 17D and 17E of that Act so that, to the extent permitted, the format and style of the reprinted enactment is consistent with current legislative drafting practice. Changes that would alter the effect of the legislation are not permitted.

    A new format of legislation was introduced on 1 January 2000. Changes to legislative drafting style have also been made since 1997, and are ongoing. To the extent permitted by section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989, all legislation reprinted after 1 January 2000 is in the new format for legislation and reflects current drafting practice at the time of the reprint.

    In outline, the editorial changes made in reprints under the authority of section 17C of the Acts and Regulations Publication Act 1989 are set out below, and they have been applied, where relevant, in the preparation of this reprint:

    • •omission of unnecessary referential words (such as “of this section” and “of this Act”)

    • •typeface and type size (Times Roman, generally in 11.5 point)

    • •layout of provisions, including:

      • •indentation

      • •position of section headings (eg, the number and heading now appear above the section)

    • •format of definitions (eg, the defined term now appears in bold type, without quotation marks)

    • •format of dates (eg, a date formerly expressed as “the 1st day of January 1999” is now expressed as “1 January 1999”)

    • •position of the date of assent (it now appears on the front page of each Act)

    • •punctuation (eg, colons are not used after definitions)

    • •Parts numbered with roman numerals are replaced with arabic numerals, and all cross-references are changed accordingly

    • •case and appearance of letters and words, including:

      • •format of headings (eg, headings where each word formerly appeared with an initial capital letter followed by small capital letters are amended so that the heading appears in bold, with only the first word (and any proper nouns) appearing with an initial capital letter)

      • •small capital letters in section and subsection references are now capital letters

    • •schedules are renumbered (eg, Schedule 1 replaces First Schedule), and all cross-references are changed accordingly

    • •running heads (the information that appears at the top of each page)

    • •format of two-column schedules of consequential amendments, and schedules of repeals (eg, they are rearranged into alphabetical order, rather than chronological).

5 List of amendments incorporated in this reprint (most recent first)